Many years later I'm finally reading a book I heard about in that course: Pedagogy of the Oppressed by the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire. The academic discussion of adult education lacks paradigms, drawing on a wide range of ideas from across the Arts and Social Sciences, but Freire's ideas are one of the few common points of reference. Here's his Wikipedia page.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed expounds an approach to adult education that seeks to avoid perpetuating existing power structures and oppressive relationships, instead serving the ends of revolution, liberation, human development, "the awakening of critical consciousness". Inevitably he also has a lot to say about those oppressive structures. I will probably come back to the ideas in that book. Just now I thought I'd share this snippet:
In a situation of manipulation, the Left is almost always tempted by a "quick return to power", forgets the necessity of joining with the oppressed to form an organisation, and strays into an impossible "dialogue" with the dominant elites. It ends by being manipulated by these elites, and not infrequently itself falls into an elitist game, which it calls "realism".Is it just me or do these words, conceived in exile and published in 1970, nonetheless provide a concise history of the rise and fall of New Labour in the UK a couple of decades later?